...Wisdom: The Art of Living Well...Pastor Phil Strong

 

Idolatry (Part 8)

8-22-10

The Bible never offers us a remedy to the human dilemma which ignores (2) fundamental responses: 1) repentance, 2) faith.

Acts 20:21 “I have had one message for Jews and Greeks alike- the necessity of repenting from sin and turning to God, and of having faith in our Lord Jesus.”

These (2) responses of repentance and faith address the futility associated with our failed attempts at making life work without God and also the hope of breaking the cycle of self-destruction and realizing life as it was meant to be lived.

“All have sinned”, as the Bible would describe it, “and fall short of the glory of God…” Romans 3:23

It says that our pursuit of life apart from God does not take us far enough. We fail to become who we were meant to be and experience the kind of life we were meant to live.

In repentance and faith, the initial process has very little to do with what you know of God or the extent of your experience.

Although you are bound by all manner of unhealthy attachments, you sense this strange, yet uncertain freedom and stability. You stand with all of the “props” kicked out from underneath you (“Trust in the Lord… and lean not on your own understanding…” Proverbs 3:5-6).

It’s this vulnerability that we feel which keeps us tethered to grace.

For all that we as humanity are capable of… limitless internet travel, genetic engineering, and now, getting tiny pretzels inside of M & M’s, we are terminally religious.

Wherever and whenever we look into the on-going history of human cultures, we find religious activity which had some common pursuits:

►There was the belief that there was something (personal or impersonal) which was higher than, other than the human person. We weren’t “self-explanatory”.

►Religion involved a ‘paradigm’; a ‘worldview’, meaning that humanity’s thoughts and conclusions about God helped form and inform how they related to their world. Their worldview answered the life questions.

►There was, out of necessity, some form of response both ethically (in the ways that we were with each other) and supernaturally (responses which we believed took us beyond ourselves: worship, commitment and prayer).

What we couldn’t then, and are still unable to agree upon, is how to go about finding and relating to this “other”.

            Some images have God as “out there”. Naturally, when he is thought of in this way, he is considered untouchable and disinterested. So, we offer him the occasional gesture (a nod or wave), but are convinced that he’s content to remain aloof.

            Some images have God as predominantly, “here”. Which, at first, sounds really comforting, but, as we stop and take a good look at the mess we’re in, we conclude that he is “kindly”, but is fairly “impotent.”            And, the more “here” he is, the more unsettling the questions we have about him [“If he’s concerned and if he’s so powerful, then why (fill in the blank)?”

For the most part, there seems reflected in history and in the story of God (the Bible) a couple of essential approaches:

            First, there is no shortage of religious expression which is rigid, demanding and manipulative. And, may I add, lifeless, frustrating and fatiguing. In a word, Paul would identify it as “conformity” (literally, ‘to be fashioned according to the pattern of another’).

Colossians 2:21-23

"Don't handle, don't eat, don't touch." Such rules are mere human teaching about things that are gone as soon as we use them. These rules may seem wise because they require strong devotion, humility, and severe bodily discipline. But they have no effect when it comes to conquering a person's evil thoughts and desires."

This is ,“Life according to the rules”,  and it is always opposed to God because it is opposed to love.

It’s a “self-rating” system. And the beauty of self-tests is that we can always judge on the curve (always compare myself to how you’re doing rather than comparing myself to God). And, you can’t really love others if you are always critiquing and categorizing them.

What you eventually discover is that not only does sin separate us from God and each other, but so does self-righteousness.

It’s “self-imposed” goodness. Boundaries seem like a good idea, but what they do best is reveal my inadequacies. So, we stretch the boundaries; we make up our own rules to accommodate our lack of proficiency (e.g. we play from 3 fairways over because we can’t keep the ball within the boundaries).

It is self-defeating and frustrating. There’s no margin for error; no room for grace. Because it is always based on appearance, it provides the perfect cover for a disorderly heart.

The alternative approach is found in that same verse: the hope for “transformation”.          

The answer is not a faith which makes no demands of us, but a faith that demands something better of us.  An appeal to live more ‘humanely’.

In this approach, we can live free of the pressure to perform because we could never live up to those expectations anyway.

Interestingly, it’s the same word used in Matthew 17 to describe this occasion we call Jesus’ “transfiguration”. He was not turning into someone else, he was being revealed for what was truly there, but often not fully evidenced to the naked eye.

Grace will lead you into a fuller experience of life than guilt ever could.

            Guilt is an effective strategy if what you are looking for is compliance, but it’s a horrible basis for a relationship.

The issue is, I can’t really love myself because I know too much! I long for this kind of love, but I have an aversion to it, as well. You see, it’s my suspicion about unconditional love which keeps me bound to the rules.

“There is no fear in love because perfect loves expels all fear” (1 John 4:18). John then goes on to offer the source of that perfected love: “…he loved us first” (19).

Grace means that the relationship is already stronger than the wrongs committed against it. Therefore, I can live in love, not fear.

Repentance and faith will always maintain this mysterious quality: we will realize that our hearts will never really be free of our attachments (propensities to satisfy ourselves apart from God) by our own willpower, yet, we will never be fully relieved of our need to choose; to respond wisely.

            Grace is most recognizable when the human person determines to respond in ways which are a reflection of the divine will at work within them. We are free to choose, yet compelled to choose a God-inspired, God-empowered pursuit of life.

“For God is working in you, giving you the desire and the power to do what pleases him” (Philippians 2:13)

In order for truth to transform our desires, it has to reach past our morality and access the “inner parts”.

Psalm 51:6 “You desire truth in the inner parts…teach  me wisdom in the inmost place.”

                God is not just interested in people who are good at following orders, but people who share his heart. The kind of people who don’t have to be told what to do all the time, because the transforming love of God is shaping them in such a way that their lives are producing what the Kingdom-way-of-life requires.

David was a guy with just such longings. Even after his own hideous moral failure, what he needed was not just the truth, but the truth that could set him free. The kind of truth that could not just “call him out”, but “draw him out”.

That kind of truth fosters humility and arouses my desire for God.

The “grace-givers” hold out mercy, but often lack the courage to address the truth (the real issue).

The “truth-tellers” often assume that the truth ‘alone’ will remedy the situation.

Fortunately, the gospel is much bigger and better than just “unconditional love”.

To say that God loves you despite your brokenness is only partially true. To say that God will not be content until you are whole and is committed to staying with you through the process, is still only partially true. To say that God loves you despite your brokenness and longs to transform you so that you might embody his healing, restorative love to a broken world… that’s the truth.

Creation is good… creation is fallen (marred)… creation will be restored (atonement: every movement of God toward his creation motivated by his loving-purpose of setting things right). This is true for our pursuit of “shalom”, as well.

“I am convinced that he who began a good work in you..until it is finished on the day Jesus Christ returns” (Philippians 1:6).

            Until then… there is “static”, incremental progress and partial fulfillment. Enough to keep us dissatisfied, but hopeful.